Category: Tim’s Motorcycle Diaries

I sold the Yamaha XS1100 yesterday.  With the Concours on life support I haven’t had the wrenching time to work on the Yam, so I put it up for sale to make room in an otherwise overcrowded garage full of old Japanese bikes that aren’t running.

The Mid-Night Edition Yamaha came to me in rough shape both physically and legally.  With only a hand written note I had to figure out how to get continuity of ownership restored.  It was a relatively simple process, but you need to be lucky (I was) and figure out how to get an affidavit worked out (I did).

Where I got lucky was that the Yamaha didn’t have a brand on it.  Had it been a write off at any point previously (and it had a long and storied eleven page history – so it was entirely possible), I’d have been up a creek.  That legal ownership near miss got me thinking about more complex ownership issues, especially when I saw this Versys pop up on Kijiji with a sad history:

A lost Versys

A bit of research has shown that this bike’s ‘irreparable Ontario title’ means it’ll never ride on the road again, it can only be used for parts.  For a bike that appears to have relatively minor damage, this seems a shame.  Others have had frustrating experiences with insurance companies writing off bikes rather than letting them buy them back and repair them (people get emotionally attached to bikes).  It’s a matter of mathematics for the insurance company though.  A bike may be repairable, but the cost of those repairs outweigh the value of the bike, so it’s deemed irreparable.

So what would you do with this otherwise lovely Versys?  You would need to pick up another Versys frame with a working title (no damage, no history of crashes) and then graft the better parts from this Versys (not the front wheel) to that valid frame.  You’d have a low mileage bike with relatively new parts, but it would cost you two bikes and a lot of time and talent to make it happen.  I’ve never seen even an older Versys for sale for any less than twenty-five hundred bucks, so you’re looking at $5000 plus a lot of work to have a modern, road-worthy Versys 650.

If you had a high mileage, older Versys sitting in the garage, it might make sense, but things change over time (especially mounting brackets and other niggly bits), so you might find that your expensive donor parts don’t actually fit.  No matter how you frame it (!), it’s more trouble than it’s worth.

If this were a limited edition or classic bike, it might make a good parts bike, but a relatively anonymous, recent Japanese bike?  You can buy an immaculate, year older bike with half the kilometres and no crashes for less than five grand.

The moral of all this?  I’ve found two.  Firstly, you’re taking a big risk buying a bike without the ownership on hand.  I got lucky with the Yamaha, but I could have as easily gone in and found that it was scraped and what I’d bought could never legally ride on the road again.  Secondly, if you see a bike with anything other than a working title in Ontario, stay away unless you’re looking for a parts bike, in which case price it accordingly.


Links & Information on Motorcycle Branding in Ontario
(and generally in North America)

https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/020376/v1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicle_title_branding
http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/vehicles/vehicle-branding-program.shtml
http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/vehicles/vehicle-branding-program-faq.shtml
http://www.gtamotorcycle.com/vbforum/archive/index.php/t-141734.html?s=73a91a4860714e30a183b20b315ff3d5
“In Ontario there is no “rebuilt” for motorcycles. They are either clear title, or scrap. If it’s ever been ‘branded’, then it can never be licensed for the road. You need to have a clean, unbranded frame in order to license a motorcycle for on-road use.”

http://ontariorodders.activeboard.com/t52382265/salvage-title/
http://www.kijiji.ca/b-motorcycle-parts-accessories/gta-greater-toronto-area/frames-with-titles/k0c309l1700272
http://www.gtamotorcycle.com/vbforum/archive/index.php/t-177188.html
http://www.gtamotorcycle.com/archives/archive/index.php/t-54857.html
http://www.gtamotorcycle.com/archives/archive/index.php/t-131215.html

Q10: How can I change the brand on my vehicle from “Salvage” to “Rebuilt”?

Sunday morning with a 3d printer – I get a kick out of making things work.

One of the best parts of my job is that I get to lay my hands on leading edge technology in order to figure it out so I can teach it.  I’ve always been an early adopter, if no no else has it I’m interested – more so if everyone else is afraid of it.  When most people didn’t know that TVs had alternate inputs I had a home computer with a printer.  When everyone was crying about how fuel injection meant no one could customize their vehicles any more I was hacking the on-board computer and using it for diagnostics and more horsepower.

Nowadays it’s all about how digital tools are making micro/bespoke manufacturing more possible.  Where once you needed an engineer, some machinists and a couple of hundred thousand dollars to build complex components, now you need twenty grand and a willingness to pick up some very easy to manage software.  The entry into machining your own, custom components has become much easier.

Not only are digital tools handing back basic production to individuals, they are also allowing companies to explore levels of precision in manufacturing that seem almost science fictional:

We’ve had 3d printers in the classroom now for a couple of years, and we find them invaluable for prototyping and even developing 3d thinking (not something students take to naturally).

I suspect the wedding-cake style melting-plastic-through-an-extruder 3d printer is an evolutionary dead end (there is only so much you can do to speed up a printing process that works around cooling plastic).  Fortunately, the next step has already happened:

… I’d love to get my hands on one of those.

Another building tool I’d like to try is a digital laser cutter.  Like other manufacturing tools, digital laser cutters have been tumbling in price.  Coming out this year is a desktop laser cutter called the Glowforge that’ll introduce laser cutting, etching and fabrication to many more people.  At only about $4000, this undercuts previous industrial units by tens of thousands of dollars.

With this kind of technology available to many more people, I get the sense that the garage of the future will allow us to build things that only get churned out by factories at the moment.  When I’m at the point that I can custom manufacture and laser etch bespoke motorcycle hard parts and print my own fairings, I’ll feel like my garage can keep up with my imagination.

A good guess might be the garage scene from Big Hero 6:

We’re on the verge of escaping from the mass-production Twentieth Century.  One day you’ll be telling your grand kids that we had to buy shoes that weren’t custom printed specifically for your feet, and they won’t believe you.

Recent advances in processing power and optics mean VR is finally (after decades of promise) arriving at a consumer level.

Last week I discovered that I’m going to be able to set up an HTC Vive in the lab.  We’re doing it so we can better craft the 3d models we’re building in Unity and Blender, but immersive simulation could offer a lot of opportunities in the classroom beyond 3d modelling.  The emotional impact on a student walking across Vimy Ridge the day after, or walking through Cambodia’s killing fields, or standing on the Moon and looking back at the Earth, get me revved up about making VR work in the classroom.

From a motorcycling perspective, an immersive simulation of the MotoGP circuit on Valentino’s bike would offer fans a new level of appreciation for the sport.  Preparing for an overseas ride by tasting the trip virtually first offer opportunities for safety preparation that simply don’t exist right now, especially if you’re trying to wrap you head around new signs and riding on the wrong side of the road.

We’re on the verge of the future, and I get another taste next week, I can’t wait!


3D printing

motorcycle 3d printing: http://3dprintingindustry.com/2015/08/03/motorcycle-3d-printing-picking-speed/

https://3dprint.com/65937/3d-printed-motorcycle/

http://www.stratasys.com/resources/case-studies/automotive/klock-werks

https://all3dp.com/3d-printed-motorcycles-know/

https://grabcad.com/library/128705


Virtual Reality

https://youtu.be/-Sd3wXNjLtk

http://motorbikewriter.com/victory-motorcycle-virtual-reality/

http://www.lifebuzz.com/virtual-motorcycle/

http://mashable.com/2015/03/13/oculus-victory-motorcycles-sturgis/

http://www.cnet.com/roadshow/news/skully-opens-pre-orders-for-high-tech-helmet/

The greatest single downward pressure on the infamous motorcycle equation is the way you’re worked over by insurance for them, especially in Ontario.  If you own one bike you’re likely to be paying about $700 a year if you’re an experienced rider.  If you’re new you can pretty much double that.  


If you buy a second bike, against all logic you’re basically doubling your insurance.  Even though two bikes mean you’re only spending half as much time on each, you get nothing back for that.


If the motorcycle industry wanted to sell more bikes, pressuring the Ontario government to make fair insurance premiums would be a good way to do it.  If you’re paying $700 a year to ride a bike, it should be less than half that to insure a second bike, not double that.  Since you can’t be on both bikes at once your chances of needing insurance drop dramatically.  What would be fair would be only applying the stationary insurance (theft, fire, etc) to a second bike, and perhaps a small fee for the paperwork.  Owning two bikes does not mean double the liability, which is the lion’s share of an insurance premium.


I’d happily budget $1000 a year instead of the $600 I pay for insurance and triple the number of bikes I’ve got licensed.  That’s three times as many vehicles paying road and license plate tax – which helps out the government, and the insurance company themselves would be making more with no increase in liability.  If only they could get past the short term money-grab philosophy they currently run with.  As it stands the ROI on a $2000 a year insurance bill makes it not worth pursuing.


What would that expanded motorcycle stable look like?  Canada’s short riding season means you need to have machine turn-key ready for the few days you can get out and enjoy the weather without it trying to kill you.  I’m currently riding a fourteen year old Triumph Tiger as my go-to bike.  It has been great, but depending on a bike that old isn’t really fair to it.  At The Forks of the Credit last weekend we had the oldest bike there by a decade.  I get a great deal of pride out of that, but I don’t want to start hating on the Triumph if it suddenly develops a fault.  That happened with the KLX and it was gone shortly thereafter.

A new bike would definitely be in the cards.  I’ve long had a crush on Honda VFRs, and they make a great all rounder.  A sporty bike that can also cover distances, and when I sat on one they felt quality, almost jewel like.  As an it’ll-always-be-ready-to-run, dependable bike, it’s a solid choice.  The website is saying this is a $15,000 proposition, but I’m sure I just saw them on sale for a touch over $10,000.

On a naked choice for a new bike I still tend toward the Kawasaki Z bikes.  The Z1000 with it’s cat like robotic stance has long scratched an anime aesthetic itch for me, but the new Z900 does too.  With the taller comfort seat it would fit me well.  The bike is under $10k and looks fantastic.  A new Kawasaki, like a new Honda, would be bullet proof and a good choice for an always-ready dependable motorbike.  Both the Honda & the Z could also handle track days.



The Tiger does a good job of two up riding (it’s a big bike), but sometimes I miss the road focused athleticism of the Concours.  The new one looks spectacular in Candy Imperial Blue.  As a two up tourer it approaches the Goldwing and other dedicated touring machines, but it retains its sports bike heritage, evaporating weight and feeling more like a Ninja in the corners.  It’s a big bike, but I’m a big guy and I look like I fit on it.  With a dedicated long distance road tool like this, perhaps the Tiger would become more adventury in purpose.

With the Tiger and one of the above on hand, in a more insurance friendly situation I’d also have a third bike that would let me focus on the off-road aspects of riding.  


I learned that a 240lb guy on a KLX250 does not add up, so I’d be looking for a 300+cc off roader so that I could keep up with traffic when on the road.  


The DRZ-400 Suzuki has long looked like the bike of choice.  They come up occasionally online.  If insurance weren’t killing it, I’d already own one.  With some frame guards and good sump protection, this would be the bike I’d trail ride and explore farm tracks on without worrying about a traffic line up behind me when I’m on the road.


The Tiger is dependable and a good two up ride, so I suspect I’d pass on the Concours.  Today the three bike stable would be the Tiger, the VFR and the DR-Z 400; a Triumph, a Honda and a Suzuki, but in other circumstances it could be a Kawasaki heavy garage.  If the Tiger weren’t the brick house that it is, I’d have a Concours, a Z900 and maybe even a KTM in the stable… if only I could pay fair insurance rates on them.

from Blogger http://ift.tt/2pea5uo
via IFTTT

I’ve always had an over abundance of mechanical sympathy.  That sympathy often spills over into full on empathy for machines.  While I derive a great deal of joy from interacting with machines, the satisfaction I get out of fixing them is amplified by this natural inclination.

My first bike was a mechanically bullet proof 2007 Kawasaki Ninja 650r.  It had been dropped and scuffed, but it didn’t need open heart surgery.  I was happy to clean it up and send it on its way, and while I got attached to it, it never felt like a two way relationship.

The Concours I have now is a whole new level of commitment.  Not only did I find it sitting in a field, buried in grass, but it took me a winter of rebuilding to get it on the road again.  In my first season riding it I’ve put on more miles than I ever did on the Ninja (it’s a much more comfortable long distance tool).

Call me nostalgic (or perverse), but getting the four carburetors on the Concours running smoothly was very satisfying.  Even though I teach computer tech, I still find the clockwork nature of mechanical parts to have a grace that digital technology is lacking.  Listening to the Connie fire up at the touch of the starter on a cold morning and clear its throat is much more satisfying than listening to the clinical hum of a fuel injector making everything perfect.

I was out on the Concours again today – if the weather’s dry I’m out on it.  I’m always astonished at how responsive such a heavy machine can feel.  It fits me well, needed me to save it, and then responded to that saving with thousands of miles of riding.  There may come a time when the Connie is more trouble than it’s worth, but at the moment it’s what I was looking for all along.

It’s getting kind of crowded in there…

The Yamaha XS1100 sitting in the back of the garage will be my first go at a restoration, but as an owned bike it isn’t really what I’m looking for.  It’ll be my first go at a bike purchased for restoration rather than riding.  I’m curious to see how that process goes.

In the meantime, and completely off topic, here is some nice motorbike art I saw at Blue Mountain last weekend:

 

 

 

I was back at Mostly Ironheads this afternoon to drop off some paperwork and took a few 3d models.  I didn’t have a chance to set pieces up in the middle of some open space, so these are a bit spotty, but they give an idea of what kind of detail you could get with a more careful modelling.

Mostly Ironheads Website

Mostly Ironheads on Facebook

With a bit of coding you could colour code the display to something specific or make different patterns.  The strip along the bottom is 9 leds long, so you could get pretty fancy with patterns if that floated your boat.  I’ve also seen Arduinos run like graphic equalizers, responding to music with different colours and patterns, so that’s another option.

Metres long LED strips can be gotten cheap.  An Arduino can be had for less than $10 if you’re cagey about it.  Three wires and a bit of perspex and you’re ready to go.  I’d guess in raw parts it cost all of about ten bucks to put together, and that includes an Arduino that could do a lot of other things.  If you’ve got a customized bike, a clean photo and a bit of prep and you’d have a disco light version of your specific machine.

I 3d modelled the Tiger a while ago using a Structure Sensor.  It snaps on to an ipad and is very straightforward to use.  Once you’ve ‘painted’ in your 3d model using the lasers on the sensor you can clean it up in something like the 3d modelling software that is included in Windows 10.  Here is what an upload of that looks like on Sketchfab:

 

from Blogger http://ift.tt/2rr7am6
via IFTTT

My son is a pretty shy guy, but he’s an instant celebrity on the bike.  When we ride home kids who might not otherwise acknowledge him want a wave.  The bike seems to produce fame on demand!

On my way in this morning on the Concours a little girl went running down the sidewalk next to me waving and giggling insanely.  That kind of thing doesn’t happen when I’m driving the mini-van.  Kids’ eyes are drawn to motorbikes like they are to anything awesome.

Two hundred metres further down the road another kid riding his BMX bike gave me a serious nod and his gaze lingered.  Perhaps that’s the magic of motorcycles, they are the adult evolution of what we loved to do as children. Kids can see themselves on a motorcycle because it’s the technological enhancement of a device they are already familiar and in love with.  Adults in cages have no analog for children, but motorcycles are immediately familiar.

Unlike the desperately-seeking-cool types on cruisers, I’m always happy to grin back and wave.

You have to wonder how hard we work on kids to scare them out of getting around on two wheels as adults when it’s such an intrinsic love for us when we’re children.  For the lucky few who find themselves back on two wheels as adults the magic can keep happening for the rest of your life.

Part of my day job involves building virtual and augmented reality sets for classrooms.  I have built dozens of systems and have tried all sorts of different combinations of hardware, we even build software that uses this tech.  I get virtual and augmented reality and I’m looking forward this fighter pilot technology finding its way into motorcycle helmets.


I saw a tweet today that suggests it’s already here in the Cross Helmet.  360° peripheral awareness is a great idea that will no doubt save lives, and having hands free navigational information is another valuable safety feature, but I have a questions about this revolutionary lid.

Most of the articles I’ve read about the Cross Helmet are by tech websites that have a hard time containing their enthusiasm about disrupting existing industries.  They typically suggest that motorcycle helmets haven’t changed in decades and that they are low tech, unimaginative things created by Luddites.  It’ll take the blinding talents of a technology company to interrupt those conservative curmudgeons in the helmet industry (sorry, sometimes the hyperbole around high-tech companies gets a bit tiresome).


Helmets aren’t supposed to be an infotainment system, they supposed to be a light-weight, effective protective item that operates in incredibly difficult circumstances.  Helmet manufacturers have thrown everything imaginable at this problem, producing carbon fibre helmets and pushing materials engineering to the limit in creating the lightest, most protective lids possible.  They’ve also applied modern aerodynamic analysis to their products, producing quieter, less buffeting protection than ever before.  To call them uninspired and backwards simply isn’t true.

The most concerning thing about the Cross Helmet isn’t the wiz-bang technology in the thing, it’s the thing itself.  That is a massive lid.  When was the last time you needed two hands to hold on to your helmet?  This size is a function of all the technology crammed into it.  A heads up display, rear facing camera, wireless connectivity, communications and the battery needed to power all that stuff weighs down the helmet and makes it big.  The actual weight of it appears to be a mystery.  Modern helmets weigh between one and two kilos, with the heaviest ones being mechanical flip top items with built in sun visors.  I can’t find a weight listed for the Cross Helmet anywhere, not even on their website.

… that’s all you get for technical details.

I’m guessing, based on the size and tech in the thing that it’ll come in at over twice the weight of what an average helmet does, which doesn’t make it a very good helmet.  On top of that, you’re looking at a slab sided thing that looks like it’ll catch cross winds like a sail.  You might be able to see behind you and get navigational details, but you’ll be stopping often because your neck can’t take it any more.

I get that the first prototype of a new design is going to have problems; this is the worst smart helmet you’ll ever see because it’s the first one.  As the tech gets smaller and designs improve, a smart helmet becomes a much more attractive idea, but I’m disinclined to dive into a (very) expensive helmet that is more of a concept than a usable thing.


Here is a list of some helmets currently on the market with their weights:


Arai DT-X 1619 grams (and check out the many technical details shared)
Roof Boxer Helmet 1650 grams (again with many technical details shared)
Roof Boxer Carbon 1550 grams (the lightest transformable/mechanical helmet I can find)
Nexx Carbon 1219 grams (the lightest helmet I can find)
Shark Evoline 1960 grams (the heaviest helmet I could find)


The lightest of them use every materials engineering trick in the book to produce helmets that meet stringent modern safety standards while also being comfortable, aerodynamic and long lasting.  They are anything but an old-school  product, Discovery Channel.


The Roof Carbon is the lightest transformable / mechanical helmet on the market.  It’s 100 grams lighter than the standard Roof Boxer helmet – that’s what you get with carbon, 100 grams.  The helmet industry is playing a game of grams, aerodynamics and safety effectiveness in a state of the art way.


If you put a 2000 gram limit on your smart helmet and required it to retain the aerodynamics and size of current lids, it would be in the vicinity of current helmets in terms of usefulness.  I doubt it’s possible to cram cameras, heads up displays, communications and batteries into a helmet using today’s tech, but someday soon?  Perhaps.

Under those awesome graphics are state of the art materials engineering resulting in unprecedented protection.

from Blogger https://ift.tt/2IltC9l
via IFTTT